What Sticks With You?
If you determine to work in Safety you mechanically signal as much as an expert lifetime of steady studying. Applied sciences, cultures and threats are always altering, and anybody who’s attempting to “do safety” on this setting should sustain.
Simply because one thing is written (a ebook, a paper) or spoken (a presentation, a podcast) doesn’t imply it’s beneficial. For books, I look to the cybersecurity canon to search out curated titles. There, a Corridor of Fame winner is one that’s vital to everybody within the business, and may stand up to the check of time. However there isn’t an business useful resource for papers, so I believed I’d go to the socials (LinkedIn, Twitter, Mastodon) to search out the solutions.
As all the time, I used to be gratified that individuals selected to share their information with me, and I used to be stunned by the choices. You possibly can see that there’s a extensive, extensive, big selection of matters and ages of those nominations.
Right here’s the record (and any feedback got here from the nominating particular person):
Aleph1: “Smashing the Stack for Fun and Profit” (Advisable twice)
Anderson, R: “Why Information Security is Hard — An Economic Perspective” for outlining the non-technical challenges that come up when coping with safety (and principally giving rise to InfoSec Economics).
Arthur, W. B.: “All Systems Will Be Gamed” on the character of exploitative conduct.
Axelsson, S.: “The Base-Rate Fallacy and the Difficulty of Intrusion Detection”
Bellovin, S: “The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header”
Bender, E. et al: “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots, Can Language Models be Too Big?” Now appears fairly prescient given the hallucinations we’ve seen in latest GPT fashions, however which is able to nonetheless start to mediate our expertise of the web and different tech.
Butler, S.: “Darwin Among The Machines”
Caltagirone, S. et al: “The Diamond Model of Intrusion Analysis”
